Difference between revisions of "Verbal Elements"

From MULL Lab Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 207: Line 207:
|-
|-
| I have lost my glasses.'
| I have lost my glasses.'
|}
=tʃɛ/tʃe=
The morphemes ''tʃɛ'' and ''tʃe'' appear as verbal elements in Igala. ''tʃɛ'' adds the meaning that something has already been done to a sentence.
{| {{table}}
|gbɔ̋
|kàkīnī
|ɛ̀
|tʃɛ̀
|wā
|mɛ̂
|-
|1SG
|hear
|C
|2SG
|already
|come
|now
|-
|colspan="7"|‘I heard that you have already come' (D:225).
|}
The morpheme ''tʃe'' is a copular element translated as do/does.
{| {{table}}
|ido
|e
|ta
|tʃe
|ɛŋʷu
|ɔla
|mi
|-
|dance(N)
|NMLZ
|dance(V)
|do
|thing
|body
|1SG.OBJ
|-
|colspan="7"|‘Dancing is my favorite thing (to do)' (D:193).
|}
In certain cases ''tʃ(e)'' seems to note additional emphasis in a situation.
{| {{table}}
|i
|tʃe
|uwɛ
|dʒɛ
|ɔda
|lɛ
|i
|n
|:
|-
|3SG.NEG
|do.EMPH
|2SG.STR
|eat
|pear
|DEF.DIST
|EMPH
|NEG.SFP
|?
|-
|colspan="9"|‘Are you not the one who ate the pear?’(D:?).
|}
|}

Revision as of 10:56, 25 February 2022

Cognate Objects

COs are true arguments of their predicate

This is shown by runing tests on the distinction between adjuncts and arguments. One of these tests is the ’do so test’ It shows that in an example like (1), the noun ’dance’ is an argument of the verb ’dance’ because ’do so’ functions as a proform for V’: “when do so is used as a substitute, it must stand for the verb and all its arguments”, (Macfarland 1995:104).

  1. Examples

(1)

(1a)

ū t(a) ídō (u)jɔ̀ ókō úbī ǒchálà ŋʷɔ̀ tʃ(e) ǎlɛ̄
1SG dance(V) dance(N) cheerful farm back my Ochala and do so/same again
'I danced a cheerful dance in my garden and Ochala did so too.'

(1b)

*u t(a) ído (u)jɔ oko ubi mi Ochala ŋʷɔ tʃ(e) alɛ ɛdo dudu/ɛdo ɛkpabjɛ
1SG dance(V) dance(N) cheerful farm back my Ochala and do so/same sad
Intended: I danced a cheerful dance in the garden and Ochala did so a sad dance.

COs can be modified, including in relative clauses

(2)

u t(a) ido k(i) a tʃ(e) ujɔ
1SG dance(V) dance(N) C IMPF COP1 cheerful/joy
‘I danced a cheerful dance’

COs in Igala only occur with unergative verbs, and not with unaccusatives

fV marker

  1. it shows up only with transitive verbs;
    1. it has a meaning similar to perfective;
    2. it is incompatible with negation;
    3. it is incompatible with A′
      1. extraction of any kind (questions, relative clauses);
    4. it is in complementary distribution with another marker, mV.

Complete situation

The morpheme fV has a perfective meaning and is used to decribe complete situations. It cannot be used to describe ongoing or habitual situations.

(3)

ù f(i) òdʒ(e) àba̋tʃà (mɛ̄)
1SG PERF1 morsel cassava cook (already)
'I have cooked mashed cassava.'
*I cooked mashed cassava just now.
*I cooked mashed cassava (habitual).
*I am cooking mashed cassava.

Word order with fV

One of the most recognizable properties of fV is its influence on word order. The surface word order in Igala is SVO, including with the progressive and the imperfective markers. However, in the presence of fV, this is modified. This morpheme appears to surface in the usual verb slot, while the matrix verb appears sentence-finally.

(4a)

ù òdʒ(e) à↑ba̋tʃà
1SG cook morsel cassava
I cooked mashed cassava.'

(4b)

ù f(i) òdʒ(e) àba̋tʃà
1SG PERF1 morsel cassava cook
'I have cooked mashed cassava.'

(5a)

ú ǒhìmìnì
1SG see ocean
'I saw the ocean'

(5b)

ù f(i) òhìmìnì
1SG PERF1 ocean see
'I have seen the ocean'

About fV and the splitting verbs

When the verb is split, the first part of the verb is before the object and second part is after the object, including with the progressive and imperfective aspectual markers.

(6b)

ù kpɔ̄ (ɔ)nà lɛ́ fɔ̄
1SG break- door DEF.DIST -break
'I broke the door.'

(6b)

Ǒtʃálā k(ɔ) ēlā lɛ́ da
Ochala cut- meat DEF.DIST -cut
'Ochala cut the meat.

(7a)

otʃala a d(u) ɔbɛ k(ɔ) ela da
Ochala IPFV take knife cut- meat DEF.DIST -cut
'Ochala will take the knife and cut the meat.'


(7b)

otʃala na d(u) ɔbɛ k(ɔ) ela da
Ochala PROG take knife cut- meat DEF.DIST -cut
'Ochala was cutting the meat with a knife.'

When f(i) is added to a sentence with a split verb, the word order seems to become SOV.

(8a)

ū f(i) ɔ̌nâ lɛ̄ kpɔ̀ fɔ̄
1SG PERF1 door DEF.DIST break- -break
'I have broken the door.'

(8b)

Ǒtʃálā f(i) ela da
Ochala PERF1 meat DEF.DIST cut- -cut
'Ochala has cut the meat.'

mV marker

In complementary distribution with fV (under unknown conditions - might have something to do with unaccusative/unergative distinction and/or thematic roles).

(9)

ù m(u) (*f(i)) őgìgò tíŋɔ̂
1SG ? (*PERF1) glasses my take lost
I have lost my glasses.'